Should You Use SQL Server Compression to Optimize Storage and Performance?
If you’ve worked around database systems for long, you’ve no doubt encountered the issue of ensuring efficient storage. As your databases grow, so do your storage sizes (and costs!). Thankfully, SQL Server provides a powerful feature that can help alleviate this problem: compression.
Compression in SQL Server is a feature that helps to reduce the amount of storage needed for tables and indexes. Think of it like compressing a large file into a smaller one. You’re taking the same data but making it more compact and efficient. The goal is to save space, reduce I/O, and make the most of your storage resources. When data is compressed, the storage required to hold the same data is reduced, which can lead to more efficient use of disk space and faster read operations.
SQL Server provides two main types of compression: row-level compression and page-level compression. Each has its strengths and specific use cases, depending on your data and workload.
Row-Level Compression
Row-level compression focuses on the individual rows within a table. In SQL Server, data types like CHAR, INT, and BIGINT are usually stored in fixed-length formats. This means that if a column is defined to be 100 characters long, but only 10 characters are used, the remaining 90 characters are just sitting there, wasting space. Even if you don’t need all the space, SQL Server still reserves it.
Row-level compression addresses this issue by converting those fixed-length columns into variable-length columns. For example, that 100-character CHAR column would only store the 10 characters you actually need, along with a small amount of overhead for metadata. The result is a more compact representation of your data because SQL Server only stores what it needs, cutting down on the unnecessary padding.
Row-level compression also gets rid of the redundancy of NULL values, replacing them with a more efficient marker. And for small data types like boolean values, SQL Server uses a technique called bit-packing, which allows multiple small values to be stored together in a single byte, saving even more space. The result is smaller, more efficient data storage.
Row-level compression also gets rid of the redundancy of NULL values, replacing them with a more efficient marker. And for small data types like boolean values, SQL Server uses a technique called bit-packing, which allows multiple small values to be stored together in a single byte, saving even more space. The result is smaller, more efficient data storage.
Page-Level Compression
While row-level compression is a great first step, page-level compression takes it a bit further. SQL Server organizes data in “pages” behind the scenes, and each page uses 8KB of storage. With page-level compression, SQL Server compresses entire pages of data, not just individual rows. The idea here is that, rather than just compressing individual rows, SQL Server applies a two-step process to an entire page of data. It’s like compressing a whole chapter of a book instead of just one sentence.
First, SQL Server applies row-level compression to each row within the page, making the data smaller. But then it goes a step further and looks for repeating patterns across rows on the same page (like repeated values) and stores them more efficiently. Let’s say there’s a column in your table with a lot of repeated values, like a date or NULLs. Rather than storing that repeated data over and over again, SQL Server will build a dictionary of those repeated values and store a reference to them instead. This is a huge win in terms of space savings, especially for large tables with lots of repetitive data.
Is SQL Server Compression Right for You?
Compression can offer significant benefits, but it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. For starters, there may be a slight CPU overhead. Compression isn’t free. Compressing and decompressing data requires processing power. In some cases, especially with page-level compression, this may put a slight strain on the CPU, which might slow down write operations like inserts, updates, and deletes.
Another potential downside is that compression doesn’t always yield massive savings depending on the nature of your data. For example, if your tables are relatively small, you might not see much benefit from compression. Also, if you are storing images in your database (and you really, really shouldn’t be), SQL Server will not be able to compress those. Compression tends to shine most when you have large datasets with lots of redundant values or many NULL entries.
On the flip side, if you’re dealing with a read-heavy workload, compression can significantly improve performance by reducing the amount of data that needs to be read from disk. This is where the benefits of compression really stand out, as it can cut down on I/O and make your database queries faster.
SQL Server compression is a powerful feature for saving space and potentially improving read performance. It helps with both storage and I/O efficiency, especially for large databases with repetitive data. But it’s important to keep in mind that there could be slight trade-offs, particularly when it comes to CPU usage. Testing is key: before you apply compression across your entire database, it’s worth evaluating the impact on both CPU resources and storage.
Want to work with The SERO Group?
Want to learn more about how The SERO Group helps organizations take the guesswork out of managing their SQL Servers? Schedule a no-obligation discovery call with us to get started.