As I sat there, I ended up reflecting back on 2025. I found myself gravitating to these three questions:

• What went well this year?
• What did I learn?
• What should I focus on next year?

If you’re a leader, I’m guessing you rarely get this kind of thinking time during your workday. I know I don’t. Our calendars are packed with calls, team meetings, and those “quick questions” that turn into two-hour troubleshooting sessions.

But here’s what I’ve learned: the quality of your strategic decisions is directly tied to the quality of your thinking time.

And thinking time doesn’t happen by accident. You have to protect it.

What Went Well This Year?

When I asked myself this question, I didn’t think about our biggest projects or flashiest achievements. I didn’t think about when we migrated almost 2,000 databases as part of an upgrade project. Or the performance tuning we did that resulted in a $36,000 reduction in annual Azure spend for a client.

Instead, I thought about the relationships we strengthened. The trust we built with clients. The problems we solved before they became crises.

For you, this might look like:

• The audit that went smoothly because your security documentation was solid
• The successful disaster recovery test that was possible because you kept refining the process
• The team member you mentored who’s now ready for more responsibility
• The support resources you provided your team through a trusted partner

These aren’t always the things that make it into board reports. But they’re the foundation that everything else is built on.

What Did I Learn?

This year reminded me of something Eisenhower once said: “Plans are worthless, but planning is everything.”

The need for planning cannot be overstated. It’s critical. Even if the plan doesn’t always work out the way you intended.

The plan itself wasn’t the point. The thinking I did while creating the plan was the point.

Because I’d thought through our capacity, our ideal client profile, and our service delivery model, I could adjust quickly when reality didn’t match my spreadsheet. I knew which opportunities were a good fit for us and which ones to let go. Because we’ve intentionally built a small but incredibly talented team that genuinely wants to see our clients succeed, we were able to identify and create ways to help them.

I watched the same dynamic play out with clients. The institutions that had documented their SQL Server environments, tested their disaster recovery plans, and mapped their compliance requirements adapted quickly when needed. They were positioned for success even when the unexpected happened.

Planning isn’t about predicting the future. It’s about building the muscle memory to respond when the future surprises you.

What did you learn this year about planning and adapting? Maybe it was:

• That your three-year technology roadmap needs quarterly reviews, not just annual ones
• That the disaster recovery plan sitting in a SharePoint folder isn’t the same as a tested DR plan
• That “we’ll address that next quarter” eventually becomes “why didn’t we address this sooner?”
• That having an expert on call beats having a plan to find an expert when something breaks

These lessons matter. Write them down. They’re not just hindsight—they’re your blueprint for better decisions ahead.

What Should I Focus On Next Year?

For me, the answer was clear: I need to help more financial institutions and healthcare organizations understand that they have options. Most CIOs think they have two choices for database management: hire a full-time DBA (expensive and hard to find) or make do with whoever can “figure it out” (risky and unsustainable).

There’s a third option: fractional DBA services that give you expert oversight without the full-time price tag.

For you, your focus might be different. Maybe it’s:

• Finally getting your SQL Server environment documented and audit-ready
• Building a disaster recovery plan that you’ve actually tested
• Move a little further along the SQL Server Maturity Curve
• Finding a partner who understands banking compliance, not just databases

Whatever it is, the key is to actually choose something. Not everything. Something. And move toward it. Make progress.

The Power of Quiet Reflection

Here’s the thing about those early Saturday morning moments: they’re rare. And precious.

During the week, we’re in execution mode. We’re responding, reacting, solving, and fixing. That’s necessary work. But it’s not strategic work.

Strategic work requires space. It requires stepping back from the urgent to focus on the important.

So, here’s my challenge to you as we wind down 2025 and usher in the new year:

Block Off Time Just to Think, Then Protect It

Maybe it’s Saturday mornings before your family wakes up. Maybe it’s a long walk at lunch. Maybe it’s 90 minutes with your calendar blocked and your office door closed.

Whatever it is, protect it. The decisions you make during that quiet time about where to focus, what risks to address, and which partnerships to invest in will help shape your entire year.

Your Turn

As you think about the year ahead, I’d encourage you to ask yourself those three questions:

1. What went well this year? Celebrate it. Learn from it.
2. What did I learn? Write it down. It’s wisdom you paid for.
3. What should I focus on next year? Pick one or two things. Not everything.

And if one of those focus areas is “finally get our SQL Server environment to a place where I’m confident, not just hopeful,” let’s talk. That’s exactly what we help institutions do.

If you’re a CIO wondering whether your SQL Server environment is as healthy and secure as it should be, I’d be happy to have a conversation. No sales pitch. Just two people talking candidly about database management. Schedule a time here.

The post Why Quiet Reflection Leads to Better IT Strategy Decisions appeared first on The SERO Group.

A reactive approach may get you through the day, but it doesn’t build long-term stability, security, or confidence.

What is the SQL Server Maturity Curve?

Over the years, we’ve found that every SQL Server environment naturally falls somewhere along a maturity curve. Understanding where your SQL Server environment is today and where you want it to be helps you move from firefighting to foresight. SQL Server maturity can be best understood in four stages: reactive, managed, optimized, and strategic.

Let’s look at each stage.

1. Reactive: Firefighting

At the lowest level of maturity, we have what we call the reactive stage. This is where SQL Server environments are managed more in a ‘break/fix’ mode. Something goes wrong—an outage, a performance issue, maybe even a regulatory problem—and the team jumps in to fix it. Since the problem usually catches them by surprise, they then have to spend time figuring out how to address the issue before they can start to fix it.

Banks in this stage tend to rely heavily on manual processes and have very little automation in place. There might be some monitoring, but it’s often not tailored to SQL Server and effectively too generic (maybe something like SolarWinds Orion). So, leaders don’t have a clear picture of what’s healthy, what’s risky, or what’s about to break.

A second indicator for this stage is an environment where no one person is truly accountable for SQL Server. It’s a shared responsibility, which really means no one’s watching it closely. It’s just one of many systems all lumped in together. In these environments, small problems slip through the cracks until they turn into something big.

A third indication is the assumption that the vendor or core provider is handling all necessary SQL Server maintenance. In reality, they’re not watching it nearly as closely as the bank thinks they are.

From a business standpoint, this leads to high operational costs, more regulatory findings, and frustrated employees and customers when things go down.

Most of the SQL-related budget at this stage goes toward putting out fires instead of preventing them. Unfortunately, this is still where a lot of community banks find themselves today—operating in a reactive state, vulnerable to risk, and always one incident away from disruption.

2. Managed: Gaining Control

The next stage up in the curve is the managed stage. In this stage banks start putting some structure in place.

Backups are running consistently. And I know what you might be thinking: ‘Of course they are.’ But you’d be surprised how often we hear that, only to find something very different once we dig in during an SQL Health Check.

Monitoring is usually turned on so the team gets alerted before things get out of hand, and patching is scheduled instead of done haphazardly.

You’ve probably heard the phrase people, processes, and technology. At this stage, banks are making solid progress on two of those: processes and technology. And there’s usually someone in IT who’s been given responsibility for SQL Server, though it’s often just one of the many things they take care of.

But the results are noticeable. Incidents are happening less often, performance is steadier, and compliance is easier to manage. There’s even some separation of duties starting to take shape.

Here, most of the SQL-related budget is still going toward maintenance, but now, instead of pure firefighting, a little bit of that time and money is shifting toward planning and improvement.

So the managed stage is a big step forward. Things are more stable, there are fewer surprises, and the environment is definitely safer. But it’s still not efficient—and it’s not yet resilient. That’s usually when the question shifts from ‘Are we stable?’ to ‘How can we do this better?’

3. Optimized: Running Proactively

Third is the optimized stage; things start to look and feel different. We’re no longer spending most of our time just keeping the lights on; the focus shifts from maintenance to efficiency.

Routine tasks like backups and testing the backups, patching, and monitoring are automated and standardized across the SQL Server environment. The team’s not reinventing the wheel on every server anymore. Builds are standardized and perhaps even automated.

Performance is managed proactively—indexes, queries, and resource usage are being reviewed on a regular basis. The bank finally has real visibility into capacity, performance trends, and risks over time.

And all that optimization pays off literally.

At this stage, banks start saving real money. They’re doing proactive performance tuning, right-sizing their environments, and consolidating where it makes sense. That means fewer servers, lower licensing costs, and less wasted hardware.

We worked with one client who was able to save about $2,000 a month—$24,000 a year—on just one of their Azure SQL Servers, simply by tuning and optimizing the setup.

And another bank we work with was able to cut their SQL footprint in half through consolidation and decommissioning efforts. That saves on licensing costs, management costs, etc.

But it’s not just about cost savings. This is also where security gets stronger. Misconfigurations get closed off, permissions are tightened, and the environment starts aligning with best practices like the CIS benchmarks and the principle of least privilege.

The payoff is easy to see. Customers experience faster, more reliable systems. Inside the bank, IT teams aren’t scrambling to fix the latest outage—they’re staying ahead of it. They identify and resolve issues before they impact operations or audits. SQL Server becomes a reliable foundation that actively supports business goals.

4. Strategic: Turning Data into Advantage

In the final stage, the strategic stage, SQL Server isn’t just stable or secure; it’s resilient by design.

High availability is built in. Disaster recovery plans aren’t just written; they’re tested and refined. Security is strong and consistent across the environment, and compliance isn’t something the team scrambles to prove once a year; it’s woven into daily operation.

Auditing and monitoring tools are in place. There’s clear separation of duties. And reporting infrastructure is mature enough to shift workloads where they make the most sense.

But what really sets this stage apart is how SQL Server starts to enable the business.

At this point, it’s not just about avoiding risk; it’s about driving strategy.

Data becomes a competitive advantage. Executives have access to real-time insights through analytics and reporting. They can spot trends, understand customer behavior, and make better decisions—faster.

And IT? It’s no longer seen as a cost center. It’s a business enabler—helping drive efficiency, innovation, and growth.

Moving Up the Curve

Wherever your institution is today, the goal isn’t perfection overnight. It’s steady progress. Moving even one stage up the maturity curve can dramatically reduce risk, improve audit readiness, and free up your team to focus on higher-value initiatives.

The key is to be intentional, to assess, document, and continually refine your SQL Server management practices.

Because in business, in banking, and in healthcare, SQL Server maturity isn’t just an IT milestone; it’s a business advantage.

Further Resources

• Curious where your environment stands today? We’ve created a short SQL Server Maturity Checklist to help you identify which stage your organization is in and where to focus next. It’s a quick, practical way to assess your current practices and start planning your path forward. Download the SQL Server Maturity Checklist to see where you stand and how to move from risk to advantage.

• For a deeper dive on this subject, you can watch our free, on-demand webinar, “Navigating the SQL Server Maturity Curve,” on YouTube.

Want to work with The SERO Group?

If your SQL Server environment feels more reactive than strategic, or if you’re ready to strengthen reliability, improve security, and become more audit-ready, we can help.

We specialize in helping institutions move up the SQL Server maturity curve with proven processes and a proactive approach. Let’s start a conversation about where you are today and where you want to be. Schedule a brief call with us today.

The post SQL Server Maturity Curve: How Banks Move from Reactive Risk to Strategic Advantage appeared first on The SERO Group.

Top 10 SQL Server Health Check Issues—and Why They Matter

1. Windows Power Plan Set Incorrectly

SQL Server can be resource-intensive—and yet, many servers are configured to run on the “Balanced” power plan instead of “High Performance.” This can limit CPU availability and throttle performance, especially under load. It’s a simple setting, but one that can have an outsized impact. Read more about checking the power plan setting.

2. SQL Server Can’t Use All Processors

SQL Server 2016 Standard Edition and later supports the lesser of 4 sockets or 24 cores. The key word there is “lesser.” Let’s look at an example.

Let’s say that you’ve licensed SQL Server Standard Edition for 16 cores. But those cores are presented to the VM as 8 sockets, each with 2 cores. Unfortunately, SQL Server Standard will only be able to use 8 cores. Why? Because it can only access cores on 4 sockets. 4 sockets times 2 cores per socket is 8 cores total.

This means that you aren’t leveraging all of the cores that you’ve licensed.

3. Too Few or Too Many TempDB Data Files

Microsoft recommends starting with one TempDB data file per logical processor, up to eight, to reduce contention on allocation structures. However, we find that many environments are configured to use either too few (often just one, leading to PFS, GAM, or SGAM contention) or too many (which can introduce unnecessary overhead and make monitoring more complex).

Misconfigured TempDB can degrade the performance of operations like sorts, joins, temporary tables, and version store activity. Read more about configuring your SQL Server tempdb files.

4. Jobs Without Failure Notifications

SQL Agent jobs that silently fail can be costly accidents waiting to happen. From backups and index maintenance to ETL workflows, you need to know when jobs fail. Yet we routinely find environments with no alerts configured. If no one’s watching, critical failures can go unnoticed for days or weeks.

We’ve received quite a few calls from soon-to-be clients where a restore from a backup is needed, yet none is available because the backup job hadn’t successfully completed in more than 6 months. Or the integrity check jobs failed with errors, but no one noticed.

5. Missing Patches or Updates

Out-of-date SQL Server instances are not only a security risk but also more likely to suffer from performance issues and instability. We often find unpatched servers that haven’t been updated in months—or even years—leaving them vulnerable to known issues with known fixes.

Learn more: Is There an Update for My SQL Server?

6. Missing Maintenance Jobs

SQL Server uses statistics to help determine the most efficient way to execute queries. When statistics are accurate, SQL Server can create effective query plans, leading to better overall performance. Conversely, outdated or inaccurate statistics can result in poor query plans and inefficient query execution.

SQL Server automatically updates statistics by default, which is OK in many cases. However, there are plenty of scenarios where relying solely on automatic updates may not be ideal. In such cases, setting up a scheduled job to manually update statistics can help maintain optimal performance.

Similarly, we find that integrity checks are not scheduled to occur regularly. That can lead to undetected database corruption. To learn more, see 10. Missing DBCC CHECKDB (Integrity Checks).

7. Default Settings That Hurt Performance or Recovery

SQL Server has several settings that can affect performance—MAXDOP, Cost Threshold for Parallelism, max memory, min memory, etc. Prior to SQL Server 2022, these were almost always suboptimal for most workloads. SQL Server 2022 does a better job at defaults, but the settings should be tuned for your workload.

Although there is no “go faster” knob in SQL Server, adjusting these defaults can bring improved performance.

8. Backup Plans That Don’t Support Requirements

One of the most important responsibilities in managing SQL Server is ensuring the integrity and reliability of database backups. SQL Server’s native backups provide powerful tools for protecting your data, especially for databases using the full recovery model. However, combining native SQL Server backups with disk or VM snapshots can cause problems during a restore. So be careful mixing your backup approaches. Read more about these problems.

We also regularly find backups that are saved to the same drive as the database, that don’t support the organization’s Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs), and that haven’t been tested. Learn more about SQL Server backups.

9. Misalignment with RTO/RPO Requirements

Stakeholders might say, “We can’t afford more than 15 minutes of downtime,” but the database configuration tells a different story. In our SQL Server Health Checks, we frequently find gaps between what the business expects (Recovery Time and Recovery Point Objectives) and what the current setup can realistically deliver. That gap needs to be closed.

You have a choice. You can adjust SQL Server to support the stated RTOs and RPOs, or you can realign stakeholder expectations.

10. Missing DBCC CHECKDB (Integrity Checks)

Without database integrity checks, corruption can silently lurk in your database, remaining undetected for weeks, months, or even longer. That’s bad. Backing up a database doesn’t magically get rid of corruption. The corruption is backed up, too. To learn more, see When Was the Last Known Good DBCC CHECKDB Integrity Check?

Stay Ahead with a SQL Server Health Check

If you haven’t reviewed your SQL Server environment recently, now is the time. These common issues don’t announce themselves—they quietly erode performance, recoverability, and reliability until something breaks. Don’t wait for that moment. Schedule a no-obligation discovery call to learn more about our SQL Server Health Check. Take control of your database environment before it controls you!

Dive Deeper: Further Reading and Next Steps

• 📋 Do I Still Need a SQL Server Health Check?
  Learn when and why Health Checks are essential—even if your SQL Server seems to be running fine.
• 🚨 The Impact of SQL Server Downtime (and How to Prevent It)
  Explore the real costs of downtime and what steps you can take to keep your environment resilient.
• 🛠️ Our SQL Server Health Check Services
  See how our structured assessments uncover hidden risks and help you align performance with business needs.
• 🎥 Recorded Webinar: RTO/RPO Considerations for Your SQL Server
  Understand how Recovery Time and Recovery Point Objectives affect your backup and disaster recovery strategy.
• 🔐 Free SQL Server Security Self-Assessment
  Quickly evaluate your environment’s security posture and receive bonus guidance on preventing ransomware attacks.
• 🔎 Public SQL Health Check Priorities (sp_Blitz)
  A community-ranked list of common SQL Server issues, created by Brent Ozar and maintained as part of his open-source tools.

The post SQL Server Health Checks: 10 Issues That Show Up Again and Again appeared first on The SERO Group.

If you’re responsible for operational stability, data integrity, or risk, it’s essential to understand the impact of undermanaged SQL Servers. Read on to discover the biggest issues—and how to prevent them before they cause problems. We’ll also show you how to build a strong business case for proactive SQL Server management.

Three Biggest Liabilities of Undermanaged SQL Servers

1. Downtime Is Costly—and More Common Than You May Think

Let’s start with the hard numbers. In the financial services industry, the average cost of IT downtime is estimated at $9,000 per minute for larger institutions. While community banks and credit unions may not hit that number, even smaller outages can disrupt transaction processing, customer support, and access to critical data—leading to lost revenue and reputational damage.

Infosecurity Magazine recently reported a study from Contrast Security that indicated that over half (54%) of global financial institutions experienced cyberattacks in the past year where data was destroyed by adversaries. 

More tellingly, a 2023 Uptime Institute report found that over one-third of data center outages across all industries stemmed from system and software issues—many of which are database-related. These are not rare events. They’re happening every day in organizations that don’t have a dedicated plan for monitoring and managing their SQL Servers.

2. Security Threats Are Rising—and Databases Are a Target

As financial institutions increase their digital footprint, SQL Servers become even more attractive to cybercriminals. In 2024, the average cost of a data breach in the financial sector rose to $6.08 million, according to industry research reported in the ABA Banking Journal. That’s a 22% premium over the global average, reflecting the high value of financial data and the regulatory scrutiny that follows a breach.

Unpatched SQL Server instances, misconfigured access controls, and lack of encryption are all common vulnerabilities in unmanaged environments. Bad actors know this, and they exploit it.

Without regular audits, patching schedules, and proactive security monitoring, your institution could be one missed update away from its next major incident.

3. Performance Issues Impact Productivity and Customer Experience

An unmanaged SQL Server environment doesn’t just create security risks; it can slow down your business. Query bottlenecks, deadlocks, resource contention, and stale indexing strategies can cripple performance over time.

For your internal teams, this means longer wait times for reports and slower access to operational systems. For customers, it can mean delays in processing payments, loan applications, or online transactions.

Each delay has the potential to damage your reputation with your customers and to frustrate your team. Aren’t you tired of hearing, “I’m sorry, my computer is just slow today,” when you’re trying to get something done over the phone?

There’s Real ROI in Proactive SQL Server Management

The risks and the costs are clear. But that’s not the end of the story.

The upside is just as compelling. Here are some key benefits of a properly managed SQL Server estate.

Enhanced Performance

• Optimized Queries: Properly tuned SQL queries execute faster, leading to quicker application response times and improved user experience. 
• Efficient Resource Utilization: Monitoring and managing resources like CPU, memory, and disk I/O prevent bottlenecks and ensure optimal performance. 
• Database Optimization: Indexing, partitioning, and other optimization techniques improve data access speed and reduce query execution time. 

Reduced Costs:

• Resource Optimization: By identifying and addressing performance issues, you can optimize resource utilization and potentially reduce hardware costs. 
• Lower Downtime: Proactive maintenance and monitoring minimize downtime, reducing business disruption and associated costs. 
• Improved Security: Strong security measures prevent data breaches and compliance issues, which can result in significant financial penalties. 

Improved Data Management:

• Data Integrity: Proper backup and recovery procedures ensure data integrity and prevent data loss. 
• Compliance: Meeting regulatory requirements and industry standards reduces the risk of penalties and legal issues. 
• Data-Driven Decisions: Access to accurate and timely data enables better decision-making and improved business outcomes. 

What Proactive SQL Server Management Looks Like

Proactive management isn’t just about reacting to alerts—it’s about preventing problems before they start. This includes:

• Proactive Daily Health Checks
• Regularly reviewing SQL Server and Windows log files
• Real-time monitoring and alerting
• Regular performance tuning and index optimization
• Patch management
• Vulnerability scanning
• Secure access controls and encryption enforcement
• Backup validation and disaster recovery planning
• Monthly or quarterly health checks and reporting
• Annual Center for Internet Security (CIS) Benchmark Assessments

Whether you manage your servers in-house or partner with a specialized team like The SERO Group, having a defined strategy can reduce your operational risk while maximizing the value of your technology investments.

The Bottom Line: Proactive SQL Server Management is a Sound Investment

Your SQL Servers are too important to be treated as set-it-and-forget-it infrastructure. As regulatory pressures grow and customer expectations rise, your institution needs systems that are healthy, secure, and reliable.

By investing in professional SQL Server management, financial institutions can reduce downtime, strengthen cybersecurity, and improve performance—while freeing internal teams to focus on their primary duties.

Don’t wait for a breach or a breakdown to take action. Make your SQL Server estate’s health and resilience a strategic priority.

Want to learn more about how The SERO Group helps financial institutions keep their SQL Servers healthy, secure, and reliable? Schedule a no-obligation discovery call.

Learn more about our:

• SQL Server CIS® Benchmarks™ Assessment
• SQL Server Health Check

The post The Costs of Undermanaged SQL Servers for Financial Institutions appeared first on The SERO Group.

Let’s take the banking sector as a prime example—though the same risks and challenges apply to healthcare and other industries.

The 5 Biggest Costs of SQL Server Downtime for Banks + 4 Ways to Prevent It

The Financial Impact of SQL Server Downtime

Downtime in the banking sector is more than an inconvenience. It’s more than just a little blimp in operation. It’s a substantial event with financial consequences.

According to a report by Splunk, companies in the financial services industry incur an average annual loss of $152 million due to downtime. That’s a staggering figure.

Breaking Down the Costs

1. Lost Revenue: During downtime, banks are unable to process transactions, leading to immediate revenue loss. For instance, a 2016 study by the Ponemon Institute found that each minute of downtime can cost a business an average of $9,000. That’s over $500,000 per hour!  
2. Decreased Productivity: Employees rely on database access to perform their duties. When systems are down, productivity stops. This affects various departments and delays critical operations.
3. Customer Trust and Brand Reputation: Customers expect uninterrupted access to banking services. Repeated or prolonged downtime can erode trust, prompting customers to seek more reliable alternatives. 
4. Regulatory and Compliance Penalties: Financial institutions are subject to stringent regulations requiring high availability. Non-compliance due to downtime can result in fines and increased scrutiny from regulators.
5. Emergency Recovery Expenses: Addressing unplanned downtime often necessitates emergency IT interventions, which can be costly, especially if external consultants are required.

The Cost of Maintaining an In-House DBA Team

Protecting and maintaining database systems like SQL Server to the level required by the financial institution requires a specific set of skills. Banks have traditionally employed in-house Database Administrators (DBAs) to help mitigate downtime risks. However, this approach comes with its own set of challenges and expenses. Let’s look at those.

Financial Considerations:

• Salaries: According to Glassdoor, the average salary for a Senior SQL Server DBA in the United States varies, with estimates ranging from $112,000 to $153,000 per year, depending on experience and location.  
• Additional Costs: In addition to salaries, banks must account for benefits, ongoing training, and the resources required for recruitment and retention, as well as eventually replacement when another institution entices them to leave.

Operational Challenges:

• Keeping Pace with Technology: The rapid evolution of database technologies necessitates continuous learning. Ensuring that in-house teams are up-to-date can be both time-consuming and costly.

Partnering with Database Experts: A Strategic Alternative

Hiring a DBA, much less a team of DBAs, can be cost-prohibitive for many banks, especially if the bank has fewer than a dozen SQL Servers. However, critical systems such as the Core Banking Systems require elevated attention from specialized DBA professionals.

A catch-22. However, there is an alternative.

Collaborating with partners provides access to skilled professional DBAs, mature DBA team processes, and monitoring and alerting toolsets required to keep a SQL Server environment healthy, secure, and reliable.

Benefits of Partnering:

• Access to Expertise: Partners like The SERO Group bring a wealth of experience and specialized knowledge, ensuring that your databases are managed using industry best practices.
• Breadth of Experience: Partners work with many different organizations and can offer insightful guidance that may not be available to an internal DBA.
• Scalability: Your SQL Server management needs will evolve as your institution grows. A trusted partner can scale services accordingly, providing flexibility without the challenges of hiring and training new staff.
• Focus on Core Competencies: By entrusting database management to professional DBAs, your internal teams can focus on strategic initiatives that drive business growth.
• Cost Efficiency: Outsourcing database management can reduce or eliminate the need for a full-time, in-house DBA team, leading to significant cost savings.

4 Proactive Measures to Prevent Downtime

Whether building an in-house DBA team or leveraging expert partners, having a proactive strategy to minimize the risk of SQL Server downtime is crucial.

Recommended Strategies:

1. Regular Health Checks: Conduct comprehensive assessments of your SQL Server environments to identify and address potential vulnerabilities before they lead to downtime. These include deep-dive Health Checks, Daily Health Checks, and regular Center for Internet Security® (CIS®) Benchmarks™ assessments.
2. Automated Monitoring: Implement tools that provide insights into database performance and configuration settings, allowing for recognition and responses to anomalies.
3. Continuous Training: Ensure that everyone involved in database management is up-to-date with the latest technologies and best practices. Provide them with the resources required to keep your systems healthy, secure, and reliable.
4. Disaster Recovery Planning: Develop and regularly test disaster recovery plans to ensure quick restoration of services in the event of an outage. Ensure your plans meet your stated stakeholder Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs).

Remember that scheduled downtime is always better than unscheduled downtime.

Working with Us

The costs associated with SQL Server downtime are substantial, affecting both the financial standing and reputation of your organization. Partnering with specialized firms like us provides a cost-effective, expert solution to SQL Server management. By adopting proactive measures and leveraging external expertise, banks can significantly reduce the risk of downtime, ensuring continuous, reliable service for their customers.

Want to learn more? Schedule a no-obligation discovery call.

The post The Impact of SQL Server Downtime (and How to Prevent It) appeared first on The SERO Group.

I’ve suffered a great many catastrophes in my life. Most of them never happened. -Mark Twain

Mark Twain’s quip may have been an admonition against excessive worrying, but it also speaks to the benefits of preparedness. When you’re prepared, you’re in the best possible position if catastrophe does strike. You’ll also lower your stress levels on all of those days when there isn’t a disaster—a win-win situation.

So, what do we need to do to prepare and protect our SQL Server from disaster?

What are disaster recovery and security maintenance?

Disaster recovery and security maintenance include regular tasks that help to protect your SQL Server from data loss and unauthorized access. These activities can and should include backing up your databases, testing your backups, monitoring for anomalies, and conducting regular security audits.

1. Regular backups and recovery testing

Backups are table stakes disaster recovery. They ensure your organization can recover data in the event of a disaster. Maybe it’s from a hardware failure. Perhaps it’s from a cyberattack. Unfortunately, user error is the cause of many data disasters. This is where backups that meet your Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) come into play.

But backing up data isn’t enough—you need to document and regularly test your recovery process to confirm that backups work as expected. Without this testing, even the best backup strategies can fall short when you need them most.

An untested backup is only the hope of recovery. Unfortunately, hope is not a strategy.

2. Security audits and vulnerability scans

Cyberattacks are a growing threat, so regular security audits are an essential tool to prevent unauthorized access and data breaches.

Security audits identify weaknesses in your SQL Server environment, allowing the vulnerabilities to be remediated before they are exploited.

Conducting vulnerability assessments, such as the CIS Benchmark Assessment for SQL Server, and updating your security policies can help strengthen your security posture and protect sensitive data. If you’re not familiar with the CIS Benchmarks, we can work with you to assess your environment and identify any security gaps in your SQL estate.

3. Monitoring and auditing for anomalies

Who has access to your SQL Server? Who has elevated permissions? When were they granted those permissions? And by whom? You’re going to want to know the answer to these questions.

So, keeping a close eye on your SQL Server environment is essential. Monitoring and auditing tools allow you to track unusual behavior, such as spikes in access attempts or unexpected changes in database structure. SQL Server has a built-in feature called SQL Audit that can help.

Catching these red flags early can help you address potential security breaches before they become full-blown incidents.

4. Data encryption and access controls

If you have sensitive data such as Personally Identifiable Information, Personal Health Information, or financial information, you should consider encrypting your data and backups.

Data encryption prevents unauthorized users from reading sensitive information, even if they gain access to it. Check out SQL Server Transparent Data Encryption to learn more.

In summary

Disaster recovery and security are essential practices for Microsoft SQL Server. For sectors like healthcare and banking, where data security and recoverability are non-negotiable, investing in these measures is a critical safeguard.

Download a SQL Server Security Self-Assessment

Securing your SQL Server is important, but knowing where to start that process can be the biggest challenge. So, we created our free SQL Server Security Self-Assessment to help you begin the process of identifying potential gaps in your security posture.

Consider a SQL Health Check or CIS Benchmark Assessment

If you’d like to know more about how The SERO Group can help assess your SQL Server estate with a SQL Health Check or a CIS Benchmark Assessment, schedule a no-obligation discovery call with us.

Looking for more information?

Here are a few links that will help.

• SQL Server Security Best Practices
• Protecting Your SQL Server from Ransomware
• Securing Your SQL Servers, What Should You Audit?
• SQL Server security best practices – Microsoft

The post SQL Server Disaster Recovery: Four Essential Security Measures appeared first on The SERO Group.

Direct and Indirect Costs of a SQL Server Estate

The costs associated with your SQL Server environment can be divided into two broad categories: direct and indirect costs.

Direct costs

The direct costs associated with a SQL Server estate include:

1. Licensing fees for SQL Server and related software
2. Hardware expenses, including servers and storage
3. Maintenance and support contracts
4. Energy consumption and data center costs
5. Cloud costs associated with VMs, Managed Instances, and Azure SQL Databases or RDS instances

Indirect costs

Indirect costs are harder to quantify but can be just as significant as direct costs. These may include:

1. Database administration and management time
2. Downtime and lost productivity when something goes wrong
3. Security risks and compliance issues
4. Opportunity costs associated with delayed projects and initiatives

A typical scenario

The direct and indirect costs can add up quickly. Here’s a typical scenario.

A company has five SQL Server VMs in Microsoft Azure and two older VMs in a rack in the old server room. Over the past year, performance has deteriorated on two SQL Server VM instances in Azure, so the system administrator who takes care of the SQL Servers added more memory and CPU. The other three SQL instances in Azure seem to be running fine without any perceivable performance issues. The two local SQL instances are primarily used for historical purposes. They are past extended support.

Can we reduce the direct and indirect costs of managing the company’s SQL estate?

Probably.

8 ways to reduce the cost of a SQL Server estate

So, let’s look at ways to reduce the cost of a SQL Server estate. This is not an exhaustive list. But it’s a good starting point as you evaluate your SQL Server environment. These are in no particular order.

1. Server Consolidation

Does the company have the right number of SQL Servers? Could they reduce the number of SQL Servers in their estate through consolidation?

Consolidating multiple SQL Server instances onto fewer, more powerful servers can reduce hardware and licensing costs. It can also reduce the number of SQL Server instances that must be managed, patched, etc.

A SQL Server consolidation effort involves:

• Assessing your current SQL Server utilization for underused resources
• Combining compatible workloads onto shared servers
• Right-sizing servers for the consolidated workloads

Scenario: In this scenario, look at the three VM SQL instances. Perhaps the company can consolidate two VMs into one SQL instance, reducing the number of Azure VMs by one. Perhaps some or all databases can be moved to Azure SQLDBs instead?

2. Right-Size Your Servers

Planning for future growth is good; however, it should be balanced with the cost of supporting your current workload. This is especially true when the SQL Server instances are in the cloud, where compute charges can add up quickly.

Overprovisioning can lead to unnecessary expenses. Ensure your SQL Servers are properly sized for their current workloads.

• Monitor server performance and utilization
• Identify bottlenecks and areas for performance optimization
• Adjust server resources (CPU, memory, storage) accordingly
• Plan for future growth

Scenario: The company can assess the current workload of the VMs. Are they overprovisioned? Can the resources be reduced without affecting performance? Perhaps they can go from 32 cores to 16 on one of the VMs?

3. Choose the Right Licensing Model

SQL Server licensing can be expensive, so it’s important to get it right for your workloads and environment. Select the most cost-effective licensing option for your organization.

• Core-based licensing vs CAL-based for smaller workloads
• Subscription-based models to help with predictable costs
• Enterprise Agreement (EA) for large-scale deployments
• Consider Software Assurance benefits

For more information about SQL licensing, check out Microsoft’s page on SQL Server 2022 pricing and licensing. If you’re uncertain about your licensing options, consider consulting a licensing expert. They may be able to save you some money.

Scenario: If the company is looking to upgrade its SQL environment, other licensing options may be available to reduce its licensing spend.

4. Implement Database Compression

Large databases can be costly. They can consume a lot of storage space. They can also frequently have performance issues.

SQL Server compression can help with both of these. It can lower your hardware costs by reducing storage costs, and improve performance by reducing overall disk I/O.

• Use built-in compression features
• Consider SQL Server columnstore compression

Scenario: Depending on the type and amount of data being stored in the databases, compression could help reduce storage space and improve performance.

5. Monitor and Optimize Performance

Poorly designed queries and inappropriate indexing can lead to more than just unhappy users. They can add direct costs to your SQL Servers estates.

Before adding additional resources to solve your performance issues, look for performance tuning and optimization opportunities. By adding an index, rewriting a query, or adjusting the database schema, you may dramatically improve the response times.

Regular performance monitoring helps identify areas for improvement.

• Use built-in monitoring tools (e.g., SQL Server Management Studio)
• Implement third-party monitoring solutions
• Analyze query performance, indexing, and resource utilization
• Adjust configuration and indexing as needed

Scenario: The system administrator recently added resources to the Azure VM to alleviate performance problems. A performance analysis may identify opportunities to improve performance by tuning some queries, adding indexing, or changing the database schemas. If so, the company could dial back down the resources for the VMs and reduce Azure spending. A SQL Health Check could also reveal that settings such as file growth, MAXDOP, or Cost Threshold for Parallelism aren’t set approximately.

6. Automate Routine Tasks

Regularly maintaining your database is important. Updating statistics, performing and testing backups, applying updates, and other maintenance can and should be scripted and automated when possible. This helps reduce administration time and reduces the likelihood of mistakes.

• Use built-in automation tools (e.g., SQL Server Agent)
• Script routine tasks using PowerShell or T-SQL
• Schedule tasks and monitor execution

Scenario: By reviewing the maintenance jobs, the company may find that statistics are not updated regularly. While looking at scheduled jobs, they should also confirm that backups that support their RTO’s and RPO’s are happening.

7. Consider Cloud Migration

This one is not necessarily a gimme. Not every workload runs better or less expensively in the cloud. But, in some situations, you can experience direct and/or indirect cost savings by moving your workloads to the cloud.

Migrating to cloud-based SQL Server solutions offers scalability and cost savings.

• Assess cloud readiness and compatibility
• Choose a cloud provider (e.g., Azure, AWS)
• Consider managed database services (e.g., Azure SQL Database)
• Plan for data migration and security

By implementing these strategies, organizations can significantly reduce costs, improve efficiency, and drive business growth.

Scenario: To simplify its SQL estate, as well as potentially save costs, the company should consider its on-prem SQL Server instances. Can some of the databases be archived and decommissioned? Can they be moved to Azure?

8. Work with a partner

System administrators and developers are smart and resourceful. However, keeping a SQL Server estate healthy, secure, and reliable requires a specific skill set—one that Database Administrators uniquely develop. Additionally, every hour a system administrator spends maintaining or troubleshooting a SQL Server estate is an hour they have been pulled away from their primary duties, creating an opportunity cost.

• Identify a SQL Server partner who has a deep level of SQL Server expertise at a fraction of the cost of a full-time DBA
• Leverage their DBA Team as a Service to help keep SQL Server healthy, reliable, and secure
• View the partner as an extension of your team

Scenario: In the example, the company can eliminate the split focus of its system administrator, identify and implement cost reduction strategies, and leverage a team of dedicated professional DBAs to manage its SQL Server estate.

Want to learn more?

Want to learn more about how SEROShield helps organizations keep their SQL Servers healthy, reliable, and secure? Let’s talk. Schedule a no-obligation discovery call with us.

The post 8 Ways to Reduce the Cost of a SQL Server Estate appeared first on The SERO Group.

Although Basic AGs were introduced before SQL Server 2022, we’ll focus strictly on the latest version.

Let’s review the requirements and limitations.

Requirements and Limitations

SQL Server Edition and Version:

• Standard Edition: Both the primary and secondary replicas must be running SQL Server 2022 Standard Edition. Basic Availability Groups are unavailable in the Express, Web, or Enterprise editions.
• Same Version: Ideally, all replicas should be running the same build of SQL Server 2022.

Verify the version by running SELECT @@VERSION. In the screenshot below, you can see which update has been applied and the SQL Server version and edition.

Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC):

• Cluster Configuration: A Windows Server Failover Cluster must be configured. All nodes participating in the Basic Availability Group must be members of the same WSFC.
• Operating System: The servers must be running a Windows Server version that supports failover clustering (e.g., Windows Server 2019 or 2022 recommended).
• Domain Membership: All nodes must be members of the same Active Directory domain or trusted domains.

In our example, we have a two-node WSFC cluster using Windows Server 2022 Standard Edition.

Network Requirements:

• Connectivity: Reliable network connections between the replicas are essential.
• Name Resolution: A proper DNS setup for name resolution between nodes is preferred.
• Static IPs: It’s highly recommended all replicas utilize static IP addresses vs. DHCP-assigned IPs.

Database Requirements:

• Full Recovery Model: The database to be included in the Basic Availability Group must use the Full recovery model.
• Single Database Support: Basic Availability Groups support only one user database per group.
• Initialization: The database must be initialized on the secondary replica using a full backup and transaction log backups. Automatic seeding can be used as well.

Replica Limitations:

• Number of Replicas: Only two replicas are supported. One primary and one secondary.
• Secondary Replica Limitations
  • Non-Readable: The secondary replica is not accessible for read operations.
  • No backups: You cannot perform backups on the secondary replica.
  • Synchronous Commit: To support automatic failover, Availability Mode must be set to synchronous commit. This is also a requirement for standard Availability Groups.

Licensing:

• Proper Licensing: Ensure that all SQL Server instances are properly licensed under Microsoft’s licensing terms for high-availability setups. See Microsoft’s licensing documentation for full details (SQL Server 2022—Pricing | Microsoft).

Permissions and Roles:

• Service Accounts: To reduce complexity, it’s recommended to use the same SQL Server service account on both replicas. Consider using group managed service accounts for further simplification.
• Firewall Settings: Configure Windows Firewall to allow communication between the replicas on the required ports (default is TCP port 5022).

Endpoint Configuration:

• Database Mirroring Endpoint: This must be configured on each replica for data synchronization. If using the wizard in SSMS, the endpoint is created and configured.

Quorum Configuration:

• Proper quorum configuration is essential to maintain cluster health and support automatic failover. This is done within the WSFC.

Summary of Limitations

• Single Database Limitation: Only one database can be included in a Basic Availability Group.
• Limited to Two Replicas: Only one primary and one secondary replica are allowed.
• No Read-Scale Capabilities: Unlike Availability Groups in Enterprise Edition, Basic Availability Groups do not support readable secondary replicas.
• No Backup Offloading: Backups cannot be performed on the secondary replica.

Conclusion

Basic Availability Groups can fill the gap if your environment doesn’t support a WSFC with the shared disk. However, due to their limitation of supporting only one database, ongoing management of multiple Basic AGs may not be ideal. For example, I’d still use a failover clustered instance if any of the following were true:

• SQL Server Standard Edition is used.
• Not spanning multiple data centers.
• The environment allows for the use of shared disks between machines.

Want to work with The SERO Group?

Want to learn more about how The SERO Group helps organizations take the guesswork out of managing their SQL Servers? Schedule a no-obligation discovery call with us to get started.

The post Basic Availability Groups: Affordable High Availability with Key Limitations appeared first on The SERO Group.

Let’s dive into some of the major risks you might face while managing your SQL Server estate. We’ll also explore some practical ways to mitigate those risks and keep your SQL Server estate running smoothly and securely.

Six Common Business Risks in a SQL Server Estate

Risk 1: Data Breaches

Data breaches are an obvious and constant threat. Hardly a day goes by without a security incident or data breach making the news. A single successful attack can expose sensitive information, damage your company’s reputation, and lead to hefty fines or lawsuits.

Securing your SQL Server estate is essential, and securing the perimeter is not enough. The best security is multi-layered.

To fortify your SQL Server defenses:

• Implement strong access controls and use multi-factor authentication.
• Regularly update and patch your SQL Server instances.
• Encrypt sensitive data both at rest and in transit.
• Conduct regular security audits to identify and address vulnerabilities.
• Train your teams on security best practices and the importance of data protection.

Risk 2: Disaster Recovery

Disasters happen. Sometimes large-scale events like a tornado, flood, or a disruption to your cloud provider’s region may affect your business. Sometimes disasters are more localized, like a hypervisor or operating system crash.

Regardless, without access to your data, operations can be significantly hampered or even completely offline. So, being prepared to quickly recover from such events is crucial for business continuity.

To improve your disaster recovery readiness:

• Develop and regularly update a comprehensive disaster recovery plan.
• Regularly test your disaster recovery procedures to identify and address any weaknesses.
• Consider cloud-based disaster recovery solutions for added flexibility and reliability.
• Ensure your team is well-trained on disaster recovery procedures and their individual roles.
• Implement high availability solutions like clustering or Always On Availability Groups.

Risk 3: Data Loss and Corruption

A common misconception is that data loss or corruption isn’t really an issue anymore. It is.

Database corruption can still happen. Users with higher levels of access can still accidentally delete needed data. And bad actors can still gain access to key systems and encrypt everything. And the results can be painful.

To protect your valuable data:

• Implement a robust backup strategy with regular backups stored securely off-site.
• Test your backups regularly to ensure they can be successfully restored.
• Implement change tracking and auditing to quickly identify and rectify data issues.
• Educate users about the importance of data integrity and proper data handling procedures.
• Use log shipping or Always On Availability Groups for critical databases.

Risk 4: Compliance and Regulatory Issues

Who has elevated permissions to your SQL Server estate? You’ll want to know and review that list regularly. When were users created and given access? When was the access removed? These are good questions to ask and answer, but that may not be enough.

If your company operates in a regulated industry or geographical location, you may be subject to regulatory requirements such as GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, and others. Ensuring your SQL Server estate complies with relevant laws is crucial. Non-compliance can result in significant fines and legal headaches.

To navigate the complex world of data regulations:

• Stay informed about regulations that apply to your industry and data types.
• Implement data masking and row-level security to protect sensitive information.
• Cleanse data that is copied to lower-level systems such as dev, test, and QA.
• Regularly audit your compliance efforts and maintain detailed documentation.
• Use SQL Server’s built-in compliance features, such as Transparent Data Encryption and SQL Audit.
• Consider working with compliance experts to ensure you’re meeting all requirements.

Risk 5: Performance Issues

Poorly performing SQL Servers are more than just an annoying inconvenience. They can frustrate users, drive away customers, and affect your company’s bottom line. As the amount of data in your SQL Server estate grows, maintaining optimal performance becomes increasingly challenging.

To keep your SQL Servers running at top speed:

• Create a performance baseline.
• Regularly monitor performance metrics to identify bottlenecks.
• Optimize queries and indexing strategies.
• Implement proper capacity planning and scaling.
• Consider upgrading hardware or moving to cloud-based solutions when necessary.

Risk 6: Talent Shortage

SQL Server is a robust and reliable database platform. However, to achieve peak performance, reliability, and security, it must be regularly maintained. However, finding, recruiting, and retaining skilled SQL Server professionals can be a significant (and expensive) challenge.

To address this talent risk internally:

• Invest in ongoing training and professional development for your existing team.
• Create a positive work environment that encourages growth and job satisfaction.
• Offer competitive compensation and benefits packages to attract and retain top talent.
• Utilize managed services or cloud solutions to supplement your in-house expertise.
• If you rely on an Accidental DBA, provide them with the resources needed to succeed.

Managing Your SQL Server Estate

Managing a SQL Server estate is no small feat, but with the right strategies and precautions, you can significantly reduce your risks and keep your data operations running smoothly. Remember, it’s not about eliminating all risks – that’s nearly impossible. Instead, focus on identifying, understanding, and mitigating these risks to the best of your ability.

Remember, you’re not alone in this journey. Don’t hesitate to leverage external expertise when needed, whether it’s for specialized tasks, security audits, or strategic planning. With the right approach and resources, you can turn these challenges into opportunities to showcase the true value of a well-managed SQL Server environment.

Want to work with The SERO Group?

Want to learn more about how The SERO Group helps organizations manage their SQL Server estates? Schedule a no-obligation discovery call.

The post Reducing Business Risks for a SQL Server Estate appeared first on The SERO Group.

Let’s think about it for a moment.

If the perfect SQL Server exists, it would be flawlessly tuned for its workload. It would have the ideal amount of hardware resources, and its settings would be perfectly optimized.

The perfect SQL Server would have a complete and unfaltering High Availability configuration. It could survive any kind of disruption: a SQL Server issue, an operating system issue, a hypervisor issue, a hardware issue, a connectivity issue, a datacenter issue, etc.

It would also have a proven, documented, and unassailable Disaster Recovery plan. If something did happen, the company’s Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs) and Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) would be easily met.

What about patching and upgrades? Operating system patches, SQL Server Cumulative Updates, and application updates would all be exhaustively tested in lower-level systems prior to ever seeing the production environment.

Data pipelines would be efficient and accurate. They would be thoroughly documented, and exception handling would be robust.

In short, the SQL Server would be protected from every imaginable contingency—from ransomware to hardware failures, from runaway queries to datacenter disruptions, from users and the things users do.

And that’s not even a comprehensive list.

Do you have an environment like that?

Probably not.

Can you create one?

Again, probably not. At least not anytime soon. And probably not on a budget.

Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good

Just because you may not be able to create a perfect SQL Server or data environment, that doesn’t mean all hope is lost. You can, and should, take incremental steps toward a better SQL Server.

So, how do you take action? Here are a few things you can do if you’re not already doing them.

Disaster Recovery

You may not be able to create an extensive approach to Disaster Recovery. However, here are some things you can do:

• Backups. Regularly verify and test your approach to backups and restores. See How Often Should I Test My SQL Server Backups? for more information.
• RTOs & RPOs. Your organization may not have explicitly defined its RTOs and RPOs, but you can set your own baseline standards. Then, adjust them as needed. See How to Align Your SQL Server to Your RPO and RTO Goals.
• Log shipping. If you don’t have the budget for “push button DR,” you can still leverage an oldie-but-goodie feature of SQL Server to help recover from a disaster: log shipping. See Configure Log Shipping (SQL Server) for a step-by-step guide.
• Asking questions. Not all advancements need be technology-based. Understanding the current state and ideal future state has value. Knowing how your business, operations, and customers would be affected if your systems were unavailable can help you align your disaster recovery approach. See Where to Start with Disaster Recovery in SQL Server.

Maintenance, alerting, and monitoring

If your company doesn’t allocate money for SQL Server tools such as SQLSentry or Redgate Monitor, you still have options. Here are some free tools you can use to maintain and monitor your servers:

• sp_blitz. You can run Brent Ozar’s sp_blitz to get a good overview of how your SQL Server is configured and functioning. See sp_Blitz®: Free SQL Server Health Check Script by Brent Ozar.
• SQL Server Maintenance solution. Ola Hallengren has a great set of tools for backing up and maintaining your SQL Servers. See SQL Server Backup, Integrity Check, Index and Statistics Maintenance (hallengren.com)
• Built-in capabilities. SQL Server has some alerting and monitoring capabilities. See A Severe Error Occurred! 5 Ways to Detect Database Corruption Early and Azure Arc-Enabled SQL Server: Centralized Management for Hybrid Environments
• Set a schedule. If you haven’t already done so, create a monthly cadence for applying patches and other updates to your SQL Servers. First to test, then to production.

Testing and lower-level systems

Sometimes the resources required for a complete set of lower-level systems simply aren’t available. The costs for allocating a full Dev, Test, QA, UAT, Demo, Training, Staging, etc, environment can add up quickly. However, you may be able to replicate some of those environments in a cost-effective way.

• Combined systems. If separate environments for each isn’t doable, perhaps you can combine some of those environments.
• Reduced environment. Sometimes storage can be an issue, especially for multi-TB databases. However, you may be able to create processes to copy a smaller subset of data to lower-level systems.
• Containers. Containers may be a good option for some lower-level systems. See Getting Started with SQL Server in a Docker Container

The SERO Group can help make your SQL environment better

Often, budgetary and capacity constraints mean our SQL Server environments are not what we wish they were. But, since we’re unlikely to ever get all the money and help we want, we can and should make incremental improvements in every area we can.

Here are a few other helpful resources:

• SQL Server Settings: Optimize For Ad-hoc Workloads
• The Risks of Mixing SQL Server Native Backups with Snapshot Technologies
• Archiving and Deletion Strategy…KonMari for Data Management?
• 5 Reasons You Should Use SQL Audit to Enhance Database Security

We work with a lot of companies that cannot justify a full-time, professional DBA to take care of their environment. If you’d like to know more about how we help them keep their data systems healthy, secure, and reliable, let’s set up a short call to discuss.

The post The Perfect SQL Server: Striving for Excellence in an Imperfect World appeared first on The SERO Group.